Sicilian Dragon: Variation (3)

Here is a more in-depth analysis:

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 Nc6 8. Qd2 0.23/25 8...  O-O 0.72/25 ( 8... Bd7 9. O-O-O Rc8 0.23/25 Houdini 2.0 x64 ) ( 8... Nxd4 9. Bxd4 O-O 0.44/33 Stockfish 2.2.2 SE ) ( 8... O-O 9. Nxc6 bxc6 0.24/26 Stockfish 2.2.2 ) 9. O-O-O 0.59/22 ( 9. O-O-O Qa5 10. Kb1 0.72/25 Deep Fritz 12 ) ( 9. O-O-O Nxd4 10. Bxd4 0.40/35 ) ( 9. O-O-O d5 10. Kb1 0.24/30 Houdini 1.5 x64 ) 9...  Bd7 0.68/26 ( 9... Nxd4 10. Bxd4 Be6 0.59/22 ) ( 9... Qa5 10. Kb1 Bd7 0.51/23 Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 ) ( 9... d5 10. Kb1 Nxd4 0.23/29 Houdini 2.0 x64 ) 10. Bh6 0.77/22 ( 10. g4 Nxd4 11. Bxd4 0.68/26 Stockfish 2.2.2 ) ( 10. g4 Qa5 11. Nb3 0.39/23 Critter 1.2 ) ( 10. g4 a6 11. h4 0.70/23 Hiarcs 13.2 ) 10...  Nxd4? -/+ 0.77/22 Fritz 13 11. Bxg7 -0.87/21 11...  Nxf3 -0.92/22 ( 11... Nxf3 12. gxf3 Kxg7 -0.87/21 Fritz 13 ) 12. gxf3 ( 12. gxf3 Kxg7 13. f4 -0.92/22 Fritz 13 ) 12...  Kxg7 ( 12... Kxg7 13. h4 Rc8 14. Nd5 -0.79/24 Fritz 13 ) *

PGN Viewer courtesy of http://chesstempo.com/

Sicilian Dragon: Variation (2)

I have been trying to analyse the Yugoslav attack in some detail recently. Obviously as a Dragon player I am seeking some equalizing / winning lines for Black. Here is one such variation:

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 Nc6 8. Qd2 O-O 9. O-O-O Bd7 10. Bh6 10. g4 Nxd4 11. Bxd4 Be6 12. h4 h5 10...  Nxd4 11. Bxg7 Nxf3 12. gxf3 Kxg7

PGN Viewer courtesy of http://chesstempo.com/